Inside the
Starving Artist ©
Volume 10 Issue 2
Like the cruel friend she is, inspiration
never seems to be there when I need her. Never arriving when I call, she keeps
me waiting, abandoned, floundering, and staring off into space, and wondering
why I volunteered to write this column. Slowly but surely, she arrives, usually
well after midnight, knowing that there is nothing left to watch on tv and so
my attention must be completely focused upon her. Today, however, I refused to
be ruled by her poor sense of timing and so off I went looking for her,
searching for something to fill up the emptiness of the white page I have been
staring out these past few hours. Fortunately, my old pal hunger, which never
ventures too far from me, showed up and caught my attention. We decided it was
time for some food, so off we went to my favorite spot, a back, dark table at Charlie’s
Chamber of Cheeses. I ordered a huge hunk of cheddar and a root beer. Devouring
my food I was distracted from the stress of waiting on inspiration. While biting
into a chunk of orange deliciousness, I noticed something odd, something new,
something interesting on the wall right in front of me, a poster advertising an
art show for sculptures, paintings and drawings currently taking place a few
blocks away. Without anything else to do, and refusing to wait on inspiration
any longer, I finished my cheesy goodness and off I went. As I entered the big
brick building, the familiar smell of paint and clay grabbed me like a
calculator at a calculus exam. As I
explored deeper into the gallery, I was informed that theme of the art show was
“Inside Outside”. Disturbingly, in the middle of the studio a movie screen was
set up and Alfred Hitchcock’s Rear Window was playing. Two unfamiliar
people were part watching, part debating with each other about intent of Hitchcock’s
cinematography with respect to certain selected scenes. While not violent, you
could tell that these two people had definite and distinct views on the
subject, neither one willing to yield to the other. I was intrigued. As I
cautiously approached these two individuals it also became clear to me that
each of them had created pieces of art on display in the gallery. Being the shy
guy that I am, I approached these artists, and told them that I had overheard
some of their conversation and asked if I might be able to ask them some
questions and possibly settle their dispute. Despite looking at me like I had
two heads, they agreed.
The first artist that I interviewed was
Michelle Li. Her slight stature proved a sharp contrast to the power of her
art. She directed me to the sculpture she created. Visually, it was difficult to find the right
words to describe it. Suffice it to say that it was a traditional house with
its exterior in as the interior and interior out as the outside. The change in
perspective was different for me and interesting. Linking these two
perspectives was the wall in the middle.
I was fascinated by this inside/outside
concept. As you may recall (and I hope that you do) I spent considerable time
discussing this concept in my last issue using the works of Marc Chagall and
Alfred Hitchcock as examples. To me, inside outside art changed from my initial
perspective of voyeuristic creeps peering around corners into and out of windows. It is a powerful way to visually represent
introspection and outside perspective within one piece of art.
Michelle told me that as a child she was an
exclusively a washable watercolor’s girl, mostly because she wanted to beautify
ever inch around her with paint. This
did not really sit well with her parents as she beautified their living room
couch! Now that she is growing up, her
art did as well. She said that as her values
and morals have changed, so have her symbols and styles of art. When she was
younger it was all manga and anime, now it is more realism and sculptures. But I am off the topic and I wanted to get
back to this inside outside concept. Michelle admitted that she had to push
herself to be motivated to do her inside outside piece for the art show, and
that she even fell asleep during Alfred Hitchcock’s Rear Window (she
lost some credibility with me on this). As
Michelle opened up to me, I began to understand. Michelle admitted that art is an evolutionary
experience involving both physical and emotional effort. Michelle explained that she sometimes
struggles to balance both her Asian and American identities both as an artist
and a person, a struggle between herself on the inside and on the outside. As she
struggles with for her identity as a person and artist she uses this as a
significant influence in her artwork.
When I asked Michelle what she wanted her
audience to experience when they viewed her art, her answer was simply, “that’s
up to them”. Sorry Michelle, I don’t buy that. An artist must communicate
something through their creations. It is not acceptable to me to passively say,
“it is up to you”. This really undermines the power of persuasion and passion
of art. I believe that an artist has a
responsibility to communicate through their art. An artist should have
something to say and communicate that to the world. Sometimes that
communication may be difficult to see or comprehend but art should have a message
or a statement, even if that message is “I won’t conform to your view of art
and so my art is without a message”.
Michelle
then left in a hurry. I either insulted her or I think I heard her muttering
about something called Comicon, but I could not make it out. Standing alone, again, I wandered toward the
second artist who Michelle had been speaking with earlier. Her name was Sarah
Robinson.
Sarah had
painted a picture of herself as a lion and it was on display at the art
show. My initial reaction was that this
was a little Wizard of Oz ‘ish, but nonetheless this painting made me
curious to find out more about the artist. I asked Sarah why she painted herself as a
male lion inside a room. She said, “I just liked lions“. While that may be true, I think that this
initial response was based upon her unwillingness to candidly discuss her work,
as much as it was about her affection for lions. Was the lion an inward reflection of herself
or an outward statement as to how she perceives herself or how she wishes other
perceive her? These are questions that will for the moment go unanswered, but
in using Michelle’s theory, “its up to you”. I see the lion as a sign of
strength and confidence. I also see her painted lion as a visual representation
of her inner self or at least the inner self that she wants the public to
believe she has.
Just like Michelle who said her art
continues to evolve, Sarah sees her own art as an ever changing process of self
discovery tied directly to her emotions. Interestingly, I never considered the
possibility that the more information you know about an artist the more you can
learn and discover from their art. For
example, Sarah did not fall asleep during Rear Window, but embraced the
film. She said that she constantly tries to
incorporate the Hitchcock concept of surprise and spontaneity into her art. Although
the depth of Sarah’s responses to my questions was relatively limited, the
depth of her images in her art was in sharp contrast to this. Sarah
incorporates different perspectives and planes, instead of one flat image. She said
that believes that “we should incorporate ourselves in our art and that her art
is a reflection of herself or her inner perceptions about herself. In admiring her recent painting, I think she communicates
this very effectively, more effectively in fact, than through her spoken words.
As I thanked Sarah for her time and
answers, she apparently forgot all about her recent disagreement with Michelle
and bounded of with her to some Comicon thing…At this point I realized it was
also my time to venture off, still in search of my illusive inspiration. My friend hunger telling me it was time for
me to go back to Charlie’s Cheese Chamber, for a late afternoon snack.
Until next time.
Adios,
AU5TIN
Excellent. I very much enjoyed this bit of writing, not just for the scatologic humor, but for the insights into creativity and artistic process that you find, It is my hope that in writing these wonderful things not only does your appreciation of art grow, but your personal growth as an artist (for a writer is that) is enhanced.
ReplyDeleteCould you post the previous ITSA that you alluded to in this one?