Book

I always thought I liked philosophy ..... Or do I? What is philosophy and what 
not is philosophy? Based upon these ideas, I can blog about Wittgenstein poker 
in numerous ways.  I can write about this book and the ideas contained therein 
in such a ways as to sound really intelligent but leave the reader saying (if 
they were brave enough) "what?" I can also profess not to really get the point 
of the book except that there were great philosophers with mega ego issues and 
major emotionally problems who disagreed with each other, except when they did 
not. Perhaps I can do both? Perhaps I can do neither? Perhaps the best idea, in 
keeping with the tradition of philosophy, is to ask what you, the reader thinks, 
and then disagree, except when I am agreeing.
I guess I have learned something from this book, or have I?